Memorix vs State Memory MCP
Two MCP servers from our memory ranking, compared on live data - updated nightly, never sponsored.
Bottom line · 2026-09-18
monthly package install counts are comparable (29,602 vs 21,257); both are actively maintained, with commits inside the last month.
How they differ in kind
Memorix focuses on: Local-first shared memory layer for AI coding agents. State Memory MCP focuses on: @putervision/state-memory-mcp is a zero-infrastructure, deterministic Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI coding assistants (such as Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini, or Copilot) with a…
What each one does
Memorix
Local-first shared memory layer for AI coding agents. One project memory system for Claude Code, Codex, CodeBuddy Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Grok Build, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Oh-my-Pi, Pi, Kiro, Antigravity, Trae, DeepSeek Harness, WorkBuddy, and any MCP-capable agent.
From the project's README.
State Memory MCP
@putervision/state-memory-mcp is a zero-infrastructure, deterministic Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI coding assistants (such as Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini, or Copilot) with a structured, persistent SQLite graph for tracking workflow state - tasks, decisions, artifacts, plans, blockers, and their semantic relationships. It runs locally over stdio via the published package.
From the project's README.
14 signals, side by side
| Signal | Memorix | State Memory MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly installs | 29,602 | 21,257 |
| GitHub stars | 785 | 89 |
| Last commit | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Releases · last 90 days | 2 | 2 |
| In the registry since | Jul 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Registry versions | 34 | 10 |
| Documented tools | not extracted - see README | not extracted - see README |
| Env vars extracted | none extracted - see README | none extracted - see README |
| Runs | local (stdio) | local (stdio) |
| Endpoint auth | local only | local only |
| Maintenance | actively maintained | actively maintained |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Category rank | #2 of 304 | #4 of 304 |
Which one, for what
Derived from the signals above, not hands-on testing.
Pick Memorix if…
- → measured package adoption matters - 29,602 monthly installs
- → category standing - #2 of 304 maintained memory servers
Pick State Memory MCP if…
- → category standing - #4 of 304 maintained memory servers
Who's behind them
Memorix - avids2: 1 MCP server tracked, 1 maintained, 785 combined stars.
State Memory MCP - putervision: 6 MCP servers tracked, 6 maintained, 210 combined stars. Full record.
Not sold on either?
The next-ranked memory servers we track:
Quick answers
Is Memorix better than State Memory MCP?
The numbers don't separate them: 29,602 vs 21,257 monthly installs, and both committed within the last month. Choose on fit - execution model, extracted environment variables, endpoint authentication, and license are in the table above. Data as of 2026-09-18.
Can I use Memorix and State Memory MCP together?
Yes - MCP clients accept multiple servers in one config, so you can enable both memory servers side by side. If their tools overlap, keep the one whose toolset fits to keep your agent's tool list lean.
Keep exploring: best memory servers · TypeScript servers · all comparisons · every server
Methodology: package-usage signal = npm/PyPI installs (last month, platform APIs) · maintenance = commit recency + release cadence (GitHub) · tool lists and environment-variable names extracted from each project's README · endpoint auth from our own nightly probes. We haven't hand-tested these servers; everything here is data as of 2026-09-18.